Monday, January 4, 2010

41 is not 100

I finished reading 41 books last year. That doesn't include (a lot of) scripts, short stories, interviews, or books I partly read, but it does include books I started before 2008 and didn't finish until 2009. In any event, it's way less than 100. In any event, I have 717 books on my to-read list. A few of these are more "to own" reference books, but there's still well over 600 books I want to read, plus 16 in my so-called "currently reading" list. I've heard of people reading 100+ books in a year, and if I want to make a significant dent in my to-read list, which I do, I think I should shoot for 100 as well. Anything to take my mind off how little a dent I've put in my student or car loans.

So 100 books means 8 or 9 books a month. I have yet to finish a single book this year, so, along with my not-insignificant work and life goals, I have my work cut out for me. I think the first two books will be Homage to Catalonia and A Short History of Myth, then probably Water Babies, Shah of Shahs, and whatever the library sends me first from my holds list. That means I should read at least one of the many unread books I have at home. Since the Australian Open's coming up, that may mean Agassi's bio, Open. Can't wait!

2 comments:

Maize said...

Umm, you're putting me to shame with all this 100 books talk. My goal is 15!! Last year, I read 10!!!! (Well, ok, I had a lot of school reading to do, but clearly mandated reading hasn't stopped you.)

Good luck, I think you can do it!!! :-)

(and yes, I'm surprised your to-read "shelf" hasn't collapsed...)

Little Miss Nomad said...

I make the mistake of reading literary-oriented blogs and found a bunch of people who read or try to read 100 books a year. It's a mammoth undertaking that I would have done with the greatest of ease as a kid. I think school reading counts, though.

In summing up, I wish I had some kind of affirmative message to leave you with. I don't. Would you take two negative messages?
-- Woody Allen